Cribado poblacional de aneurismas de la aorta abdominal. Estudio piloto en Salamanca / Population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Pilot study in Salamanca

Introducción: una estrategia para reducir la mortalidad de los aneurismas de la aorta abdominal es conocer su existencia en fase asintomática. Así podremos clasificar los pacientes, en función del tamaño del aneurisma, en candidatos a cirugía programada o a seguimiento periódico. Objetivos: conocer la eficacia, la seguridad y la aceptabilidad de un programa piloto de cribado de aneurismas de la aorta abdominal mediante ecografía abdominal realizada en una población de riesgo. Material y métodos: programa organizado por la Real Academia de Medicina y el Instituto de Investigación Biomédica y ejecutado por el Servicio de Angiología, Cirugía Vascular y Endovascular del Hospital Universitario de Salamanca. El cribado se realizó hace un año, en dos carpas situadas en una céntrica plaza de Salamanca. El análisis incluyó a 295 varones ≥ 65 años, residentes en Salamanca capital, de forma libre y gratuita. Se excluyeron aquellos con aneurisma aórtico conocido. Se realizaron: 1) registro de datos; 2) eco Doppler color por especialistas en angiología y cirugía vascular, y 3) encuesta de satisfacción. Todos firmaron un consentimiento informado. Resultados: el diámetro transversal medio de la aorta abdominal fue de 1,81 ± 0,36 cm. Se detectaron 2 aneurismas (diámetro mayor: ≥ 3,0 cm; 3,1 y 4,7 cm) y 3 ectasias aórticas (diámetro ≥ 2,5 y < 3,0 cm). El 98,3 % (290 varones) no presentó ectasia o aneurisma (aorta < 2,5 cm). Tres individuos (obesidad o aire intrabdominal) fueron reevaluados posteriormente. Se analizaron los factores de riesgo y los antecedentes de la población cribada. 180 participantes del cribado (61,0 %) rellenaron anónimamente una encuesta de satisfacción, con resultados muy positivos. Conclusión: si bien el rendimiento de detección fue bajo, la estrategia y el método empleado fueron satisfactorios para el equipo explorador y la población explorada. Este estudio piloto nos permitirá planificar y organizar un segundo cribado más amplio y de nuevos objetivos.(AU)

Introduction: a strategy to reduce the mortality of abdominal aortic aneurysms is to know their existence in theasymptomatic phase. This way we can classify patients, mainly according to the size of the aneurysm, into candi-dates for scheduled elective surgery or periodic follow-up.Objectives: to determine the effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of a pilot screening program for abdominalaortic aneurysms, using abdominal ultrasound, performed in a risk population.Material and methods: program organized by the Royal Academy of Medicine and the Biomedical ResearchInstitute, and carried out by the Angiology and Vascular Surgery service of the University Hospital of Salamanca.The screening was carried out a year ago, in two tents located in a central square in Salamanca. The study included295 men over 65 years of age, residents of Salamanca capital, free of charge. Those with known aortic aneurysmwere excluded. The following were carried out: 1) data recording; 2) color echo-Doppler, by specialists in angiologyand vascular surgery; and 3) satisfaction survey. All signed an informed consent.Results: the mean transverse diameter of the abdominal aorta was 1.81 ± 0.36 cm. Two aneurysms were detect-ed (largest diameter ≥ 3.0 cm; 3.1 and 4.7 cm), and 3 aortic ectasias (diameter ≥ 2.5 and < 3.0 cm). The 98.3 %(290 men) did not present ectasia or aneurysm (aorta < 2.5 cm). Three individuals (obesity or intra-abdominal air) weresubsequently re-evaluated. The risk factors and background of the screened population were analyzed. A satisfactionsurvey was completed freely and anonymously by 180 screening participants (61.0 %) with very positive results.Conclusion: although the detection performance was low, the strategy and method used were satisfactory for theexploring team and the population explored. The present pilot study will allow us to plan and organize a second,broader screening with new objectives.(AU)

Infección de prótesis aórtica abdominal: tratamiento alternativo / Infected abdominal aortic prosthesis: an alternative therapy

Introducción: la infección de prótesis aórtica en la cirugía vascular convencional es un evento catastrófico, con una alta tasa de morbilidad y de mortalidad. El tratamiento tradicional ha sido la remoción de la prótesis y la reconstrucción con bypass extraanatómico. En algunos casos, se ha llevado a cabo el reemplazo con prótesis impregnadas en antibiótico; en otros, el reemplazo con vena femoral superficial y también la cirugía abierta con drenaje de las colecciones asociadas y antibioticoterapia de por vida. Caso clínico: se presenta el reporte de un caso de infección protésica tratada con drenajes de las colecciones y antibioticoterapia de larga duración, con un resultado favorable un año después de su complicación. Discusión: en algunos casos, dada la severidad del paciente, es posible intentar un tratamiento conservador de esta nefasta complicación.(AU)

Introduction: in traditional vascular surgery, aortic prosthesis infection is a catastrophic event with high morbidity andmortality rates. Traditional treatment is the removal of the valve followed by extra-anatomic bypass reconstruction. Insome cases, antibiotic-impregnated prosthesis replacement has been performed. In others, superficial femoral veinreplacement, and open surgery with drainage of the associated collections and lifelong antibiotic therapy.Case report: this is the case of a patient with aortic prosthesis infection undergoing draining collections and lifelongantibiotic therapy with a favorable outcome 1 year after the complication.Discussion: in some cases, given the severity of the patient, we can try to treat this dreaded complication conservativel.(AU)

Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in primary care. / Utilidad de la ecografía en el cribado del aneurisma de aorta abdominal en atención primaria.

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) constitutes a pathology with high mortality. There is currently no screening program implemented in primary care in Spain. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the usefulness of ultrasound in the detection of AAA in the at-risk population in primary care. Secondarily, to identify subjects whose vascular risk (VR) should be reclassified and to determine whether AAA is associated with the presence of carotid plaque and other risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional, descriptive, multicenter, national, descriptive study in primary care. SUBJECTS: A consecutive selection of hypertensive males aged between 65 and 75 who are either smokers or former smokers, or individuals over the age of 50 of both sexes with a family history of AAA. MEASUREMENTS: Diameter of abdominal aorta and iliac arteries; detection of abdominal aortic and carotid atherosclerotic plaque. VR was calculated at the beginning and after testing (SCORE). RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients were analyzed (age: 68.3±5 years; 89.3% male). Baseline RV was high/very high in 55.3%. AAA was detected in 12 patients (8%; 95% CI: 4-12); aortic ectasia in 13 (8.7%); abdominal aortic plaque in 44% and carotid plaque in 62% of the participants. VR was reclassified in 50% of subjects. The detection of AAA or ectasia was associated with the presence of carotid plaque, current smoking and lipoprotein(a), p<0.01. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of AAA in patients with VR is high. Ultrasound in primary care allows detection of AAA and subclinical atherosclerosis and consequently reclassification of the VR, demonstrating its utility in screening for AAA in the at-risk population.

Herramientas para el tamizaje de aneurisma de aorta abdominal / Tools for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening

Introducción. El aneurisma de la aorta abdominal (AAA) es la dilatación de la aorta abdominal mayor de 1,5 veces el diámetro esperado. Su prevalencia es variable, con tasas reportadas de hasta el 12,5 %. Se considera como causa de muerte de más de 10.000 personas al año en los Estados Unidos. El objetivo de esta revisión de la literatura fue describir los factores de riesgo y las herramientas de tamizaje de AAA. Métodos. Se realizó una búsqueda de la literatura utilizando dos ecuaciones en bases de datos electrónicas, empleando términos seleccionados de "Medical Subject Heading" (MeSH) y "Descriptores en Ciencias de la Salud" (DeCS). Se evaluó la calidad de los estudios con la herramienta STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology). Resultados. Se recolectaron 40 artículos y a partir de ellos se construyó el texto de revisión, identificando en estos, los factores de riesgo asociados al desarrollo de AAA, tales como sexo masculino, tabaquismo, hipertensión arterial, antecedente familiar y obesidad, entre otros. La diabetes mellitus parece actuar como factor protector. Dentro de los instrumentos de tamizaje, el ultrasonido abdominal es uno de los más usados. Conclusión. El AAA es una patología multifactorial. En la actualidad la ultrasonografía de aorta es el método de elección para el tamizaje, permitiendo la detección precoz. El tamizaje de AAA con métodos no invasivos, como el ultrasonido, es útil sobre todo en zonas con prevalencia alta de la patología y en pacientes con determinados factores de riesgo.

Introduction. Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a dilation of the abdominal aorta greater than 1.5 times the expected diameter. Its prevalence is variable, with reported rates of up to 12.5%. It is considered the cause of death of more than 10,000 people a year in the United States. The objective of this literature review was to describe risk factors and screening tools for AAA. Methods. A literature search was conducted using two equations in electronic databases, using terms selected from "Medical Subject Heading" (MeSH) and "Descriptors in Health Sciences" (DeCS). The quality of the studies was evaluated with the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) tool. Results. Forty articles were collected and from them the review text was constructed, identifying the risk factors associated with the development of AAA, such as male sex, smoking, high blood pressure, family history and obesity, among others. Diabetes mellitus seems to act as a protective factor. Among the screening instruments, abdominal ultrasound is one of the most used. Conclusion. AAA is a multifactorial pathology. Currently, aortic ultrasonography is the method of choice for screening, allowing early detection. Screening for AAA with non-invasive methods, such as ultrasound, is useful especially in areas with a high prevalence of this pathology and in patients with certain risk factors.

Rolipram impacts on redox homeostasis and cellular signaling in an experimental model of abdominal aortic aneurysm. / Impacto del tratamiento con rolipram sobre la homeostasis rédox y la señalización celular en un modelo experimental de aneurisma de aorta abdominal.

INTRODUCTION: Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs) of the PDE4 subfamily are responsible for the hydrolysis and subcellular compartmentalization of cAMP, a second messenger that modulates vascular functionality. We had shown that PDE4B is induced in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and that PDE4 inhibition by rolipram limits experimental aneurysms. In this study we have delved into the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effect of rolipram on AAA. METHODS: AAA were induced in ApoE-/- mice by angiotensin II (Ang II) infusion. Aneurysm formation was evaluated by ultrasonography. The expression of enzymes involved in rédox homeostasis was analyzed by real-time RT-PCR and the activation of signaling pathways by Western blot. RESULTS: Induction of PDE4B in human AAA has been confirmed in a second cohort of patients. In Ang II-infused ApoE-/- mice, rolipram increased the percentage of animals free of aneurysms without affecting the percentage of aortic ruptures. Quantitative analyses determined that this drug significantly attenuated aortic collagen deposition. Additionally, rolipram reduced the increased Nox2 expression triggered by Ang II, exacerbated Sod1 induction, and normalized Sod3 expression. Likewise, PDE4 inhibition decreased the activation of both ERK1/2 and the canonical Wnt pathway, while AKT activity was not altered. CONCLUSIONS: The inhibition of PDE4 activity modulates the expression of enzymes involved in rédox homeostasis and affects cell signaling pathways involved in the development of AAA.

Usefulness of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in controlling puerperal bleeding in patients with abnormal placental implantation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Abnormalities of placental implantation, which make up the spectrum of placenta accreta, are associated with high maternal morbidity and mortality due to massive bleeding during delivery. Placing aortic occlusion balloons helps control the bleeding, facilitating surgical intervention. A new device, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), minimizes the risks and complications associated with the placement of traditional aortic balloons and is also efficacious in controlling bleeding. The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness, efficacy, and safety of REBOA in puerperal bleeding due to abnormalities of placental implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between November 2019 and November 2021, our interventional radiology team placed six REBOA devices in six women scheduled for cesarean section due to placenta accrete. RESULTS: Mean blood loss during cesarean section after REBOA (3507.5 mL) was similar to the amounts reported for other aortic balloons. The mean number of units of packed red blood cells required for transfusion was 3.5. Using REBOA provided the surgical team with adequate conditions to perform the surgery. There were no complications derived from REBOA, and the mean ICU stay was <2 days. CONCLUSION: The technical characteristics of the REBOA device make it a safe and useful alternative for controlling massive bleeding in patients with placenta accreta.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm characteristics and outcomes: a single-center retrospective cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and its correlation with mortality in the first 30 days after the procedure was performed. METHODS: Demographic information, clinical and radiological characteristics, as well as outcomes 30 days after the procedure was performed were assessed and compared. Continuous variables were analyzed with Student's t-test and categorical with Chi-square and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Duration of the procedure (p = 0.001), blood loss (p < 0.001), age > 75 years (p = 0.027), aneurysm size > 65 mm (p = 0.01), open surgery (p = 0.001), presence of pain (p = 0.005), chronic kidney disease (p = 0.03), and rupture of the aneurysm (p < 0.001) were the factors significantly associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: It is essential that patient characteristics and comorbidities are assessed, as well as factors that may affect the outcomes to predict the prognosis in patients with AAA. At present, no mortality predictive model is universally applicable and highly variable performance across different populations might need a model that adapts to the population of interest.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar las características y resultados de los pacientes con aneurisma de aorta abdominal y su correlación con la mortalidad en los primeros 30 días después de realizado el procedimiento. MÉTODOS: Se evaluó y comparó la información demográfica, las características clínicas y radiológicas, así como los resultados a los 30 días de realizado el procedimiento. Las variables continuas se analizan con la prueba de t de Student y las categóricas con Chi-cuadrado y la prueba exacta de Fisher. RESULTADOS: La duración del procedimiento (p = 0.001), pérdida de sangre (p < 0.001), edad > 75 años (p = 0.027), tamaño del aneurisma > 65 mm (p = 0.01), cirugía abierta (p = 0.001), presencia de dolor (p = 0.005), enfermedad renal crónica (p = 0.03) y rotura del aneurisma (p < 0.001) fueron los factores asociados significativamente a la mortalidad. CONCLUSIÓN: Es fundamental evaluar las características de los pacientes y las comorbilidades, así como los factores que pueden afectar los resultados para predecir el pronóstico en pacientes con aneurisma de aorta abdominal. En la actualidad, ningún modelo predictivo de mortalidad es universalmente aplicable y la alta variabilidad de resultados entre diferentes poblaciones podría necesitar un modelo que se adapte a la población de interés.

Rotura de aorta abdominal en fibrosis retroperitoneal idiopática / Abdominal aortic rupture in idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis

Introducción: la fibrosis retroperitoneal (FRP) es una enfermedad poco frecuente que se caracteriza por la formación de tejido inflamatorio y fibroso en el espacio retroperitoneal, alrededor de la aorta abdominal y de las arterias ilÍacas, incluyendo con frecuencia los uréteres. Caso clínico: describimos el caso de un paciente de 90 años con diagnóstico de FRP tratado previamente con metilprednisona que acudió a urgencias por la rotura de un aneurisma inflamatorio de la aorta abdominal. Discusión: en las formas de FRP asociadas con aneurisma aórtico abdominal se recomienda tratamiento quirúrgico o endovascular cuando el diámetro aórtico es superior a 5,5 cm o tiene un crecimiento rápido (> 1 mm al mes), ya que el peligro de ruptura parecería no ser mayor que para los aneurismas ateroscleróticos. Sin embargo, no existen pautas ni algoritmos a seguir en el manejo vascular de pacientes con FRP y una aorta “no aneurismática” ante el fracaso del tratamiento con esteroides. Por otro lado, está descrito el riesgo de remodelación arterial y dilatación aórtica progresiva durante el tratamiento con esteroides. Aunque tales cambios suelen ser subclínicos, se han reportado casos que requirieron tratamiento quirúrgico por ruptura, como en nuestro paciente, en el que la complicación ocurrió a pesar de tener un diámetro aórtico máximo inferior a 4 cm.(AU)

Introduction: retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare disease characterized by the formation of inflammatory and fibrous tissue in the retroperitoneal space, around the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries, often including the ureters. Case report: we present a 90-year-old male patient with RPF treated with meprednisone, who attended to the emergency room due to a ruptured inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm.Discussion: in RPFs associated with abdominal aortic aneurism, endovascular or surgical treatment is recommended when the aortic diameter is larger than 5.5 cm or when it is rapidly growing (> 1 mm/month) because the danger of rupture would appear to be the same as atherosclerotic aneurysms. However, there are no guidelines or algorithms to follow the vascular management of patients with PRF and a "non-aneurysmal" aorta in the event of failure steroid treatment. On the other hand, the risk of arterial remodeling and progressive aortic dilatation during steroids treatment has been described. Although the changes are subclinical, there were reported cases in which the patients received surgical treatment due to the rupture, such as in our patient where a complication occurred despite having a maximum aortic diameter of less than 4 cm. Recently, a series of 6 patients with RPF non-aneurysmal abdominal aorta, that had not responded properly to medical treatment, received infrarenal abdominal aorta endovascular exclusion.(AU)

Utilidad de la oclusión aórtica con balón REBOA para el control de las hemorragias puerperales en pacientes con anomalías de la implantación placentaria / Usefulness of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in controlling puerperal bleeding in patients with abnormal placental implantation

Antecedentes y objetivo: Las anomalías en la implantación placentaria, que conforman el espectro de la placenta acreta, son causa de alta morbimortalidad maternal por la hemorragia masiva que se produce en estas pacientes durante el parto. La colocación previa de balones de oclusión aórticos ayuda a controlar el sangrado, disminuyéndolo y facilitando la intervención quirúrgica. Existe un nuevo balón de oclusión aórtico denominado REBOA que minimiza los riesgos y las complicaciones asociadas a la colocación de los balones aórticos tradicionales además de lograr el control de las hemorragias. El objetivo del presente estudio es evaluar la utilidad, la eficacia y la seguridad del balón REBOA en las hemorragias puerperales por anomalías en la implantación placentaria. Material y métodos: Desde noviembre del 2019 hasta noviembre del 2021 se han colocado, por parte de radiología intervencionista, 6 balones REBOA en 6 mujeres que iban a ser tratadas mediante cesárea programada de acretismo placentario. Resultado: En el estudio realizado, las pérdidas de volumen sanguíneo durante la cesárea tras la colocación del balón REBOA son similares a las reportadas en la literatura con otros balones aórticos, con una media de 3.507,5ml. La media de requerimientos transfusionales fue de 3,5 concentrados de hematíes. El uso del balón REBOA proporcionó al equipo quirúrgico unas condiciones adecuadas para realizar la cirugía. No hubo complicaciones derivadas de su colocación y la estancia media en UCI de las pacientes fue inferior a 2 días. Conclusión: El balón REBOA, gracias a sus características técnicas, se plantea como una nueva alternativa segura y útil para el control de las hemorragias masivas en las pacientes con acretismo placentario.(AU)

Background and aims: Abnormalities of placental implantation, which make up the spectrum of placenta accreta, are associated with high maternal morbidity and mortality due to massive bleeding during delivery. Placing aortic occlusion balloons helps control the bleeding, facilitating surgical intervention. A new device, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), minimizes the risks and complications associated with the placement of traditional aortic balloons and is also efficacious in controlling bleeding. The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness, efficacy, and safety of REBOA in puerperal bleeding due to abnormalities of placental implantation. Material and methods: Between November 2019 and November 2021, our interventional radiology team placed six REBOA devices in six women scheduled for cesarean section due to placenta accrete. Results Mean blood loss during cesarean section after REBOA (3507.5mL) was similar to the amounts reported for other aortic balloons. The mean number of units of packed red blood cells required for transfusion was 3.5. Using REBOA provided the surgical team with adequate conditions to perform the surgery. There were no complications derived from REBOA, and the mean ICU stay was < 2 days. Conclusion The technical characteristics of the REBOA device make it a safe and useful alternative for controlling massive bleeding in patients with placenta accreta.(AU)

Procedural and long-term outcomes of elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians / Resultados perioperatorios y a largo plazo de la reparación electiva endovascular del aneurisma de aorta abdominal en octogenarios

Abstract Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the immediate and long-term outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) between patients under and over the age of 80 with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Methods: From 2011 to 2017, we conducted a retrospective cohort study with AAA patients who received elective EVAR. Primary outcomes included hospital mortality, length of stay, acute kidney injury, and the need for re-interventions. Secondary outcomes included aneurysm-related mortality, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, acute limb ischemia, and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Results: A total of 77 (62.6%) patients under the age of 80 years old and 46 (37.4%) octogenarians were included in the study. The male gender and AAA diameter did not differ among groups (92.2% vs. 82.6%, p = 0.11 and 5.4 cm [4.9-6.2 cm] vs. 5.4 cm [5-6 cm], p = 0.53, respectively). The younger patients had a higher prevalence of tobacco use (72.7% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.01). There were no deaths during the index hospitalization. The incidence of reinterventions (5.3% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.11) and acute kidney injury (14.3% vs. 23.9%, p = 0.18) did not differ between groups, but the length of stay was longer for octogenarian patients (3 days [2-4] vs. 2 days [2-3, p = 0.04]). Endoleaks were the most common cause for re-interventions (81.8%), with a prevalence of 34% across the entire cohort. There were no differences in any of the secondary outcomes between groups. Conclusion: In octogenarian patients with AAA, EVAR represents a safe procedure both during the index hospitalization and during long-term follow-up.

Resumen Objetivo: Comparar los resultados inmediatos y a largo plazo de la reparación endovascular del aneurisma de aorta abdominal (REVA) entre pacientes menores de 80 años y octogenarios. Método: Cohorte retrospectiva que incluyó pacientes con aneurisma de aorta abdominal (AAA) sometidos a REVA electiva desde 2011 hasta 2017. Se evaluaron como punto finales primarios la mortalidad hospitalaria, la duración de la estadía hospitalaria, la incidencia de insuficiencia renal aguda y el requerimiento de reintervenciones. Los puntos finales secundarios incluyeron la mortalidad asociada al aneurisma, infarto agudo de miocardio, accidente cerebrovascular, isquemia arterial aguda de las extremidades y ventilación mecánica prolongada. Resultados: Se incluyeron 77 (62.6%) pacientes menores de 80 años y 46 (37.4%) octogenarios. La prevalencia de sexo masculino y el diámetro del AAA no difirieron entre ambos grupos (92.2% vs. 82.6%, p = 0.11 y 5.4 cm [4.9-6.2 cm] vs. 5.4 cm [5-6 cm], p = 0.53, respectivamente). Los pacientes más jóvenes presentaron una mayor prevalencia de tabaquismo (72.7% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.01). No se registraron muertes durante la hospitalización índice. La incidencia de reintervenciones (5.3% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.11) e insuficiencia renal aguda (14.3% vs. 23.9%, p = 0.18) no difirieron entre ambos grupos, pero la estadía hospitalaria fue más prolongada en pacientes octogenarios (3 días [2-4 días] vs. 2 días [2-3 días], p = 0.04). La causa más frecuente de reintervenciones fue la presencia de endofugas (81.8%), con una prevalencia del 34% en toda la cohorte. No se observaron diferencias en ninguno de los puntos finales secundarios entre ambos grupos. Conclusión: En pacientes octogenarios con AAA, la REVA presentó un buen perfil de seguridad perioperatorio y a largo plazo.

Ecografía abdominal básica en medicina intensiva y VExUS Score / Abdominal ultrasound and VExUS score in critical care

El uso de la ecografía en las unidades de críticos se ha extendido de forma exponencial en las últimas dos décadas y se ha convertido en una parte esencial de nuestra práctica clínica. La ecografía abdominal es una técnica ampliamente establecida en otras especialidades, pero su uso en cuidados intensivos ha quedado rezagado respecto a otras modalidades de ecografía. Sin embargo, su potencial papel en el diagnóstico y manejo de los pacientes lo convertirá en una herramienta invaluable para los intensivistas. El uso más extendido de la ecografía abdominal a pie de cama es para la valoración de la presencia de líquido libre en el paciente traumático. No obstante, la ecografía abdominal también puede ayudarnos a diagnosticar pacientes con dolor abdominal, hipovolemia o anuria, y puede guiarnos en procedimientos como la paracentesis o el sondaje vesical o gástrico. (AU)

The use of ultrasound while caring for critically ill patients has been increasing exponentially in the last two decades and now is an essential component of intensive care practice. Abdominal ultrasound is an established technique in other specialties, but its use in intensive care has lagged behind other ultrasound modalities. However, its potential role in the diagnosis and management of patients will make it an invaluable tool for intensivists. The main use of abdominal ultrasound at the bedside is for free fluid detection in trauma patients. But abdominal ultrasound can also help us diagnose patients with abdominal pain, hypovolemia or anuria, and it can guide us during procedures such as paracentesis or bladder catheter and gastric tube placement. (AU)

Tratamiento endovascular de aneurismas con anatomía aórtica compleja / Endovascular treatment of aneurysms with complex aortic anatomy

RESUMEN Introducción: la anatomía arterial es la principal limitante para el abordaje aórtico endovascular estándar. Presentamos nuestra experiencia para la reparación endovascular de aneurismas aórticos complejos. Material y métodos: estudio observacional retrospectivo en pacientes con aneurismas complejos (yuxta/pararrenales y toracoabdominales) tratados en forma consecutiva mediante: endoprótesis fenestradas (FEVAR), ramificadas (BEVAR), con EndoAnchors (ESAR), o en chimenea (ChEVAR). La decisión de la técnica fue determinada con base en la anatomía arterial. Resultados: se evaluaron los últimos 50 procedimientos (6 mujeres; edad promedio 71,3 años; diámetro 69,6mm; 3 pacientes con aneurismas complicados), de los cuales 22 recibieron FEVAR (2,8 fenestraciones / paciente), 11 BEVAR, 11 ESAR y 6 ChEVAR (1,8 chimeneas /paciente). La tasa de éxito técnico fue del 100% (ausencia de endoleak I o III con permeabilidad adecuada de los vasos viscerales). A 30 días 3 pacientes fallecieron (6%). Durante el seguimiento, 5 pacientes presentaron oclusión de la arteria renal, repermeabilizada en 4. Cuatro pacientes desarrollaron un endoleak tipo IA (3 ESAR secundarios y un ChEVAR), un paciente un endoleak IC y un cuarto uno IIIB (22%, 3 de los 11 ESAR, ninguno de los FEVAR industriales). En el análisis de supervivencia, la supervivencia global fue del 88,6% al año, y libre de reoperación del 86,5%. Conclusiones: se trata de la primera publicación en nuestro medio que muestra un enfoque global del paciente con un aneurisma de aorta complejo, de acuerdo con sus características anatómicas. Estas tecnologías ya desempeñan un papel primario en el tratamiento de estos pacientes.

ABSTRACT Background: Arterial anatomy is the main limiting factor for standard endovascular aortic (EVAR) approach. We present our experience for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms. Material and Methods: This is a retrospective observational study in patients with complex aneurysms (juxta/pararenal and thoracoabdominal) treated consecutively with: fenestrated (FEVAR), branched (BEVAR), EndoAnchors (ESAR), or chimney (ChEVAR) stents. The decision of the technique was determined based on the arterial anatomy. Results: The last 50 procedures were evaluated (6 women; mean age 71.3 years; diameter 69.6 mm; and 3 patients with complicated aneurysms), among whom 22 received FEVAR (2.8 fenestrated stents/patient), 11 BEVAR, 11 ESAR and 6 ChEVAR (1.8 chimney stents/patient). Technical success rate was 100% (absence of type I or III endoleak with adequate patency of the visceral vessels). Three patients died within the first 30 days (6%). During follow-up, 5 patients presented with renal artery occlusion, treated successfully in 4 cases. Four patients developed type IA endoleak (3 secondary ESAR and one ChEVAR), one patient IC endoleak and almost a quarter of cases type IIIB endoleak (22%, 3 out of 11 patients receiving ESAR, none of the industrial FEVAR group). In survival analysis, overall survival analysis was 88.6% at one year, and 86.5% of cases were free from reoperation. Conclusions: This is the first publication in our setting that shows a global approach to the patient with complex aortic aneurysm, according to the anatomical characteristics. These technologies already play a primary role in the treatment of these patients.

Manejo del aneurisma de aorta abdominal sintomático no roto: últimos adelanto / Management of symptomatic unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: state of the art

RESUMEN El aneurisma de aorta abdominal (AAA) sintomático no roto es una patología que involucra a aquellos pacientes con AAA intacto, pero que presentan dolor abdominal y/o lumbar atribuido al aneurisma. Esta forma de presentación clínica es po tencialmente mortal dado que su etiopatogenia comprende cambios agudos en la pared aórtica, incluyendo inflamación, lo que incrementa la probabilidad de ruptura inminente. Está claro que estos pacientes deben ser derivados a reparación del AAA. Sin embargo, el momento de la intervención es controvertido. Por lo tanto, el objetivo del presente trabajo fue revisar la información actualizada sobre el abordaje diagnóstico-terapéutico del AAA sintomático no roto.

ABSTRACT Symptomatic unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) refers to a group of patients with intact AAA but who present abdominal and/or lumbar pain attributed to the aneurysm. This form of clinical presentation is potentially fatal since its etiopathogenesis, involving acute changes in the aortic wall, including inflammation, increases the probability of impending rupture. It is clear that these patients should be referred to AAA repair. However, the timing of the intervention is contro versial. Therefore, the aim of the present work was to review updated information on the diagnostic-therapeutic approach of symptomatic unruptured AAA.

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, what does the interventional radiologist and vascular surgeon need from our report?

Abdominal aortic aneurysm is defined as a dilatation of the abdominal aorta greater than 3cm. Its prevalence is between 1 and 1.5 cases per 100 people, constituting an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Rare in women, its frequency increases with age and its most frequent location is between the renal arteries and the aorto-iliac bifurcation. Approximately 5% of cases will involve the visceral branches. It is a silent pathological process whose natural evolution is rupture, which often has a fatal outcome and whose diagnosis is part of the pathology that we will find in emergency radiology. The involvement of the radiologist and the preparation of an accurate diagnostic report, as soon as possible, is essential for decision-making by the team in charge of the patient's surgery.

Infección de endoprótesis aórtica abdominal. Experiencia de una década y revisión de la literatura / Abdominal aortic endograft infection. A decade of experience and literature review

Introducción: La infección de endoprótesis de aorta abdominal (EVAR) es una entidad infrecuente, pero con una elevada mortalidad. Son escasas las publicaciones al respecto en nuestro país y no hay un consenso definitivo acerca de su manejo. Se acepta como gold standard la cirugía de explante, planteándose como alternativas la antibioterapia asociada a drenaje o limpieza del saco. Métodos: Revisión retrospectiva descriptiva de las endoprótesis aórticas tipo EVAR infectadas en nuestro centro terciario (Hospital Universitario de Cruces) en la última década (2010-2019). Resultados: Describimos las características clínicas y microbiológicas de 10 infecciones de EVAR, así como su manejo y resultados obtenidos. La incidencia de infección de EVAR fue del 3%. El tiempo medio hasta la presentación clínica de la infección fue de 16,9 meses (mediana de 4,5 meses). Se logró el diagnóstico microbiológico en el 100% de los casos (predominio de cocos grampositivos). La mortalidad global fue del 50% (sin embargo, la supervivencia fue del 100% tras limpieza quirúrgica del saco). Conclusiones: El cultivo de muestras de colecciones periprotésicas y saco aneurismático muestra una gran rentabilidad, llegando al diagnóstico microbiológico en todos los casos, a pesar de ser negativos los hemocultivos en un 50%. Destacan los buenos resultados obtenidos con la limpieza quirúrgica y preservación del dispositivo, asociada a antibioterapia. Sin embargo, en nuestra serie de casos se aprecia una importante heterogeneidad, lo que dificulta elaborar recomendaciones de manejo y obliga a individualizar el tratamiento.(AU)

Introduction: Aortic endograft infection is an infrequent but life-threatening complication after endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR). There is no consensus on management of endograft infection and little evidence has been published in our country. Endograft explantation is considered the “gold standard” treatment whereas percutaneous or surgical perigraft and sac drainage associated to antibiotics should be considered and alternative therapy. Methods: We carried out a retrospective and descriptive review of abdominal aortic endograft infections at our tertiary center (Hospital Universitario Cruces) during last ten years (2010–2019). Results: We describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics of 10 EVAR infections, their management and outcomes. The incidence of graft infection after EVAR was 3%. The mean time to the clinical presentation of infection was 16.9 months (median 4.5 months). The microbiological diagnosis was reached in 100% of cases (predominance of gram-positive species). The overall mortality rate was 50% (although the survival rate was 100% after surgical drainage of the sac). Conclusions: Perigraft or aneurysm sac aspiration culture shows their diagnostic utility as microbiological diagnosis was reached in all cases despite of blood cultures being only positive in 50% of the samples. Surgical drainage and endograft preservation combined with antibiotherapy show remarkable results. The high heterogeneity in our case series makes difficult to offer general recommendations, thus far, a tailored approach to treatment is suggested.(AU)

Abdominal aortic endograft infection. A decade of experience and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Aortic endograft infection is an infrequent but life-threatening complication after endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR). There is no consensus on management of endograft infection and little evidence has been published in our country. Endograft explantation is considered the "gold standar" treatment whereas percutaneous or surgical perigraft and sac drainage associated to antibiotics should be considered and alternative therapy. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective and descriptive review of abdominal aortic endograft infections at our tertiary center (Hospital Universitario Cruces) during last ten years (2010-2019). RESULTS: We describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics of 10 EVAR infections, their management and outcomes. The incidence of graft infection after EVAR was 3%. The mean time to the clinical presentation of infection was 16.9 months (median 4.5 months). The microbiological diagnosis was reached in 100% of cases (predominance of gram-positive species). The overall mortality rate was 50% (although the survival rate was 100% after surgical drainage of the sac). CONCLUSION: Perigraft or aneurysm sac aspiration culture show their diagnostic utility as microbiological diagnosis was reached in all cases despite of blood cultures being only positive in 50% of the samples. Surgical drainage and endograft preservation combined with antibiotherapy show remarkable results. The high heterogeneity in our case series makes difficult to offer general recommendations, thus far, a tailored approach to treatment is suggested.

A novel balloon-assisted technique to secure visceral catheterization during a chimney endovascular repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in a centenarian patient / Uma nova técnica assistida por balão para assegurar a cateterização visceral durante o reparo endovascular, com a técnica de chaminé, de um aneurisma de aorta roto em um paciente centenário

Abstract A 100-year-old male patient was admitted with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm due to type IA endoleak. Given the proximity of the ruptured site to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and renal arteries, a ChEVAR was indicated. Catheterization of the target visceral vessels was a challenging procedural step because of an intensely tortuous thoracic aorta. This hostile aortic anatomy also inhibited exchange for a super stiff guide-wire and selective cannulation with the diagnostic catheter was repeatedly lost when guidewire exchange was attempted. To overcome this issue, a 5 x 40 mm balloon catheter was placed 3cm into the target arteries. The balloon was then inflated below the nominal pressure limit enabling safe exchange for a super stiff guidewire and placement of three 90-cm long 7Fr guiding sheaths. The procedure was thus safely performed with deployment of an aortic extension and the bridging stents.

Resumo Um paciente de 100 anos foi diagnosticado com um aneurisma de aorta abdominal roto por um endoleak 1A. Pela proximidade do ponto de ruptura com a artéria mesentérica superior (AMS) e as artérias renais, um ChEVAR foi indicado. A cateterização das artérias-alvo foi um passo desafiador pela intensa tortuosidade da aorta torácica. Essa anatomia aórtica hostil também impediu a troca por um fio-guia extra-rígido, e a cateterização seletiva foi repetidamente perdida quando a troca de fio-guia foi tentada. Para superar essa dificuldade, um cateter balão 5mm x 40mm foi posicionado nas artérias-alvo. O balão foi, então, insuflado abaixo da pressão nominal, permitindo uma troca segura do fio-guia por um fio-guia extra-rígido e o posicionamento de três bainhas longas 7Frx 90cm. Assim, o procedimento foi executado de forma segura, com o implante de uma extensão aórtica e dos stents recobertos.

Aneurisma aórtico abdominal infeccioso por Salmonella en un paciente con diabetes mellitus / Infected abdominal aortic aneurysm due to Salmonella in a patient with diabetes mellitus

Resumen Presentamos el caso de un paciente de edad avanzada, con diabetes mellitus descompensada, quien presentó un cuadro clínico de fiebre y dolor abdominal recurrente, tras lo cual fue diagnosticado con un aneurisma infeccioso de la aorta abdominal, los cuales representan solamente un 1% de todos los aneurismas. El paciente fue sometido a resección quirúrgica del aneurisma, injerto con dacrón impregnando con rifampicina y tratamiento antibiótico intravenoso. La microbiología del aneurisma confirmó infección por Salmonella. Actualmente, el paciente se encuentra asintomático y sin evidencia laboratorial de proceso inflamatorio.

Abstract We present a case of an elderly patient with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, who presented with recurrent fever and abdominal pain, after which he was diagnosed with an infected abdominal aortic aneurysm, which represents only 1% of all aneurysms. The patient underwent surgical resection of the aneurysm, rifampicine-impregnated Dacron graft placement and intravenous antibiotic treatment. Microbiology reported Salmonella infection in the aneurysm. Currently, the patient is asymptomatic and without laboratory evidence of inflammatory process.

Infected abdominal aortic aneurysm due to Salmonella in a patient with diabetes mellitus.

We present a case of an elderly patient with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, who presented with recurrent fever and abdominal pain, after which he was diagnosed with an infected abdominal aortic aneurysm, which represents only 1% of all aneurysms. The patient underwent surgical resection of the aneurysm, rifampicine-impregnated Dacron graft placement and intravenous antibiotic treatment. Microbiology reported Salmonella infection in the aneurysm. Currently, the patient is asymptomatic and without laboratory evidence of inflammatory process.

Presentamos el caso de un paciente de edad avanzada, con diabetes mellitus descompensada, quien presentó un cuadro clínico de fiebre y dolor abdominal recurrente, tras lo cual fue diagnosticado con un aneurisma infeccioso de la aorta abdominal, los cuales representan solamente un 1% de todos los aneurismas. El paciente fue sometido a resección quirúrgica del aneurisma, injerto con dacrón impregnando con rifampicina y tratamiento antibiótico intravenoso. La microbiología del aneurisma confirmó infección por Salmonella. Actualmente, el paciente se encuentra asintomático y sin evidencia laboratorial de proceso inflamatorio.